Podcast Title: “Greyzone Talks: Marriage, Morality & The New Theocracy”
Episode: #143 — “Wives, Judges & Rhythm: What’s Up with 6C’s Marital Revolution?”
Hosts: Jess Deno (32, media personality, agnostic, ex-music critic)
and Kane Withers (34, former tech analyst, occasional sociopolitical streamer)
Views (in 24 hours): 519,000 and rising
[INTRO MUSIC FADES OUT]
Jess:
“All right, welcome back, folks. Episode 143. Today... we’re diving into the weirdest, boldest, most quietly seismic thing happening in the U.S. right now that almost no one on the coasts is talking about—6C’s marital system.”
Kane:
“Yeah. You heard that right. Not their theology. Not their memes. Not Lady Vega’s leather robes.
We’re talking about… marriage registration. In states they actually control.”
Jess (ughs):
“It’s nuts, man. You think it’s all just ‘wives and robes’ until you start reading the actual structure. And then you’re like—wait, they’ve quietly abolished the entire civil marriage system in 20 states? No court licenses. No state fees. No same-sex recognition. Just… this private network of what they call ‘Marital Enforcement Officers.’”
Kane (dryly):
“And judges. Don’t forget the judges. I watched a leaked seminar from Ohio—yes, I went full nerd. The guy literally said, ‘The state is no longer a third party to your marriage. You and your partner are contracting in God’s sight—not the government’s.’”
Jess:
“And those judges? They’re all Muslim.
Like, that’s not a rumor. That’s by design. Former Christians who converted to 6C can’t even apply for those roles.”
Kane:
“Yeah, I found that bit fascinating. It’s not about belief—it’s about literacy in divine w. They want people who understand Zahiri jurisprudence, the school of Ibn Hazm. That’s like the most hardcore literalist branch of Ismic thought, for those who don’t know.”
Jess (leaning into mic):
“And yet—it applies to everybody.
Like… your average non-religious lesbian in Michigan? She’s subject to the same marital ws as a hijabi woman in Indiana. But it’s not Sharia. It’s this weird, hyper-strict, fttened code that they call civic harmony.”
Kane:
“And don’t get it twisted—it’s working.
At least from their own metrics. There’s a growing css of women who like being in Femme Groups. They get housing, shared childcare, economic autonomy in exchange for polygamy.”
Jess:
“And don’t forget the Concubines Cuse. Like—yes, that’s real. A registered man can have up to two concubines on top of his four wives. But only under conditions of provision, consent, and exclusive sexual access. It’s not sexual freedom. It’s sexual structure.”
Kane:
“And everything is being adjudicated outside the civil system. If you want to get married in Iowa or Arkansas now?
You don’t go to the courthouse. You go to a marital enforcement center. You pay no government fee. You hand 200 directly to the woman, in front of two witnesses. That’s it.”
Jess (mocking disbelief):
“It’s like: marriage as API. Religion as infrastructure. And the rest of us? Still trying to figure out if our county clerk accepts Apple Pay.”
Kane (serious):
“Look. I don’t think I’d ever want to live in 6C territory. But I’ll say this:
They’ve created a system that makes the emotional chaos of modern retionships look… trivial.”
Jess:
“That’s the scary part. It’s not about being devout. It’s about offering predictability.
And in a country where no one trusts dating apps, no one trusts cohabitation w, and no one trusts state courts to fix anything—they’ve given people structure. Ritual. Even hierarchy. And people are taking it.”
Kane:
“If you told me ten years ago that marriage registration would become a frontline of the culture war—I’d have ughed.
Now? I think it might be the whole war.”
Jess:
“And 6C didn’t shout. They just repced the framework.
One marriage at a time.”
[OUTRO MUSIC BEGINS]
Kane (final line):
“Whether you think it’s dystopia or divine order—
You can’t pretend it’s not happening.”
Jess:
“Stay sharp, stay weird.
Until next time, Greyzone.”
.....
Greyzone Talks — Live Comment Segment (Post-Episode #143)
Episode Title: “Wives, Judges & Rhythm: What’s Up with 6C’s Marital Revolution?”
Live Comment Feed: ON SCREEN
Live Viewers: 62,000
Total Episode Views (24 hrs): 537,000
[Background: Lo-fi synth fades in while the hosts lean toward their monitors, reading viewer questions streaming in from multiple ptforms.]
Jess (reading aloud):
“Okay, this one’s from @LostInTulsa:
‘Why are they letting Muslim judges rule over non-Muslims? Isn’t that... religious overreach?’”
Kane (nods):
“Great question. And honestly—it’s one of the core criticisms coming out of former ACLU circles.
But from 6C’s perspective? They don’t see these ws as ‘Muslim ws.’ They see them as divine-civic ws—neutral in terms of public identity, but inspired by fiqh.”
Jess:
“Yeah, like—we’re used to religion being a private belief system. 6C treats it as architecture. They argue Muslims have the ‘juridical literacy’ to enforce the structure because it’s built on Zahiri logic. Whether you believe in it or not? You still live inside it.”
Kane (scrolling):
“Ooh—here’s a spicy one from @NeoFemme94:
‘So lesbians can be in Femme Groups, but gay men get arrested? WTF?’”
Jess (blinking, honest):
“That’s not a misreading. That’s literally the w. 6C’s Third Commandment permits lesbianism, and their Fifth Commandment allows women to be bisexual—as long as they each have only one male sexual partner. But male homosexuality? Forbidden. Full stop.”
Kane:
“It’s the cssic patriarchal asymmetry. But it’s not hypocrisy to them—it’s hierarchy. Women can share beds. Men can’t.
It’s rooted in older Ismic rulings where lesbian acts weren’t criminalized in the same way as male-male intimacy.
6C codified that... and built a civic order around it.”
Jess (reading from chat):
“@SnarkyHistorian writes:
‘This sounds like medieval governance with a TikTok rebrand. Are people really buying into it?’”
Kane (grinning):
“Oh they’re not just buying. They’re building lives around it.
Go check the FEMME Blog. Go search the AnchorLink app. Go look at how many thousands of women are forming Femme Groups and marrying Anchors in states like Iowa, Arkansas, and Michigan.”
Jess:
“Some of them are queers, former securs, and even ex-progressive organizers.
They’re not brainwashed. They’re... exhausted.
And 6C offers what liberalism failed to deliver: ritualized security, moral rhythm, and administrative intimacy.”
Kane (scrolling):
“@GameTheoryToby asks:
‘Why don’t former Christians who converted to 6C become judges? Aren’t they loyal too?’”
Jess (nodding):
“They are loyal. Sometimes more than Muslims. But 6C restricts legal interpretation to those raised in the epistemology.
You can believe in 6C... but unless you were formed by divine w tradition, you’re not entrusted to judge it.
It’s not about belief. It’s about juridical training. Converts can advise, but not rule.”
Kane:
“Let’s be real: It’s elitist. But it’s also functional. 6C doesn’t want a populist free-for-all. It wants order.
Muslim judges give them that order, because they operate within the linguistic and procedural logic that 6C was built on.”
Jess (final scroll):
“All right, st one from @WifeFourOrNone:
‘Is it working?’”
They both pause. Then Kane leans in, serious now.
Kane:
“Economically? It’s producing stability.
Socially? It’s restructuring gender with far less resistance than we’d expect.
Is it freedom? No.
Is it control? Yes.
But is it functioning?”
Jess:
“Yeah... It’s functioning terrifyingly well.”
[OUTRO MUSIC FADES IN]
Jess:
“Thanks for joining the chaos, Greyzone. We’ll see you next week.”
Kane:
“And remember—structure is seductive. Even when it scares you.”
****
Podcast Title: “She/Her/Us” – Radical Dialogues in Queer Womanhood
Episode #208: “Polygamy, Femme Groups & The L Question: Should We Leave the LGBTQ?”
Host: Nico Vega (41, longtime lesbian rights activist, known for sharp wit and no-filter politics)
Guest Co-Host: Dr. Lita Moon (38, queer sociologist and gender historian, author of “Post-Queer Futures”)
Live Viewers: 120,000 | 36-hour Views: 890,000
[INTRO MUSIC: Soulful beat with retro synth overy]
Nico Vega (opening strong):
“Welcome back, queers and rebels. Today, we’re going straight—no pun intended—into the most controversial topic hitting lesbian spaces right now:
6C.
Yes. That theocratic, polygamy-promoting, male-indexing, pork-banning movement now running 20 U.S. states—and building a legal system that, weirdly, recognizes us.”
Dr. Lita Moon (cutting in):
“And by ‘us,’ she means: lesbians. Not LGBTQ as a whole. Not queers with twenty adjectives. Lesbians.
Because, surprise surprise, 6C’s legal doctrine says it loud and clear—Commandment 3: Permit Lesbianism.”
Nico (pulling up tablet):
“And let me quote from their actual w. This is from that viral chapter in El Monroe’s PhD:
‘Lesbianism is permitted. Shared intimacy between women shall not be reguted unless it viotes other marital contracts.’
And then:
‘Lesbians may form domestic Femme Groups. Their retionships shall be recognized as internal trust units.’”
Lita (leaning forward):
“So while gay men are being detained, dragged to rhythm reconditioning centers—lesbians are being offered housing, recognition, shared custody, even inheritance frameworks. All under what they call the Wife Femme Cuse.”
Nico (shaking her head, conflicted):
“It’s patriarchy.
But it’s patriarchy that lets us live.”
Segment 1: What’s Actually Happening in 6C Marital Courts?
Lita:
“Okay, quick breakdown. Civil marriage? Abolished. State of Ohio? Doesn’t recognize your wedding license anymore. Same with Indiana, Arkansas, Michigan. Instead, marriage is now private contract—husband gives wife 200, two male witnesses watch it, and boom: legal.
And for us? Lesbians? We can’t marry each other. But we can legally live together in state-protected Femme Groups.”
Nico:
“I watched a registration video st night. Three women signing a Femme Group Pact. One of them—clearly the dominant—says she’s happy to share custody of their kid with her co-wife. It was...
I mean, I hated that I didn’t hate it.”
Segment 2: Should Lesbians Break from LGBTQ and Join 6C?
Nico (sighs):
“Let’s go there. It’s trending already—#RemoveTheL. It’s messy. It’s offensive. It’s real.”
Lita:
“Mei-Ling Chan, that viral defector from LGBTQ panels, stood on a 6C stage st week and said—‘Lesbians should break from LGBTQ. Gay men don’t represent us. Feminists don’t protect us. 6C does.’”
Nico:
“And 10,000 lesbian accounts reposted that clip saying ‘We don’t owe the Q anything.’”
Lita:
“I know. And here’s the thing: 6C gives structure to what mainstream LGBTQ doesn’t. Femme Groups are legal. Polygamy protects financial ties between women.
LGBTQ, by contrast? Just vibes. No housing. No healthcare. No family w.”
Nico (visibly torn):
“I hate their theology. I hate the Prophet stuff.
But if I had to choose between being erased by liberal performatives and being institutionally acknowledged by a patriarchal theocracy...
God help me, I don’t know where I’d nd.”
Lita:
“Here’s a dirty truth—6C has done more to legally recognize lesbian intimacy in the st two years than the federal government has in a decade.”
Closing Segment: Stay or Go?
Nico (looking into the mic):
“Here’s my message to lesbian viewers. You don’t have to join 6C.
But you do have to ask:
Why did the only system in America that gave you structure, recognition, and shared domestic rights... come from a theocracy?”
Lita:
“And why is the L still bending under the weight of LGBTQ when our lives, our models, and our survival needs... have never really matched theirs?”
[OUTRO MUSIC FADES IN – haunting, rhythmic synth beat]
Nico:
“We don’t have to love the structure. But we can’t ignore who’s offering it.”
Lita:
“This was She/Her/Us. Next week? We talk about custody battles under Femme Trusts.”
Nico (smirking):
“Because apparently, we’ve got courts now.”
***
“She/Her/Us” – Viewer Response Segment
Episode: #208 — “Polygamy, Femme Groups & The L Question: Should We Leave the LGBTQ?”
Host: Nico Vega
Guest Co-Host: Dr. Lita Moon
Live Chat: ON — Viewer Count: 142,000 and climbing
Overy Banner: “LIVE REACTIONS: Lesbian Autonomy or Theocratic Trap?”
[Segment Opening: Synth beat fades down, ambient lighting softens. Nico leans into her mic, Lita refreshes the live feed.]
Nico Vega:
“Okay, babies. You came to fight, and we are here for it. We’re gonna take ten minutes to read your comments, questions, pushbacks—and maybe, let’s be honest, some internal screaming.”
Lita Moon (grinning):
“You’re all blowing up the feed. Let’s go.”
First Comment – @VelvetGraveyard:
“Y’all are pying with fire. 6C is literal theocracy. Just because they let lesbians breathe doesn’t mean it’s liberation.”
Nico (nods):
“Valid. We’re not saying 6C is utopia. We’re saying the absence of state protections elsewhere made a theocracy look like a structure worth analyzing. That’s not praise. That’s diagnosis.”
Lita:
“Letting us breathe isn’t liberation. But refusing to criminalize us while giving shared housing and custody rights? That’s more than most liberal states have offered, frankly.”
Second Comment – @QueerChaiLover:
“Why aren’t we fighting to reform LGBTQ from the inside? Why leave the umbrel?”
Lita:
“Because sometimes the umbrel turns into a cage. Lesbians get folded into slogans, used for protest aesthetics, then erased when we want female-specific policy or intimacy recognition.”
Nico:
“And let’s be real—Q and T issues are crucial. But they are not the same as L issues. 6C figured that out. We didn’t.”
Third Comment – @StudNextDoor:
“I’m a butch lesbian married in Chicago. Under 6C w I’d be erased. Or recssified. Or worse.”
Nico (firmly):
“That’s the cost. Absolutely. But we also see butch lesbians thriving inside Femme Groups—not as erased bodies, but anchors of domestic rhythm. The category gets reassigned under 6C, not always erased.”
Lita:
“Still, consent is key. No one’s saying move to Arkansas tomorrow. We’re just asking—what does it mean when the only pce protecting lesbian cohabitation rights is the one also banning gay men?”
Fourth Comment – @NihilistMom94:
“Isn’t this just patriarchal containment dressed up in pretty nguage?”
Lita:
“Yes. And that’s the genius. It’s containment, yes—but it’s functional containment. It’s legal scaffolding. 6C offers tools, not slogans.”
Nico:
“And let’s be clear. The system is still patriarchal. But if patriarchy is offering livable conditions and securism is offering aesthetic inclusion with legal erasure? We’re gonna talk about it.”
Fifth Comment – @OldSchoolDyke:
“I lived through Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. Now you’re telling me to trust a movement with concubines in its doctrine?”
Nico (ughs softly):
“No, babe. We’re saying watch what works. We’re not asking you to marry an Anchor. We’re asking you to understand why so many lesbians already have.”
Lita (leaning in):
“You don’t have to convert. But you can’t afford to ignore a legal structure that is actively reshaping lesbian domestic life.”
Sixth Comment – @DustyInDixie:
“What’s the endgame? Is 6C trying to co-opt lesbians for legitimacy?”
Lita:
“Probably. And we’re co-opting their system back. Use the ws. Use the trust frameworks. Then reshape them from the inside.”
Nico (raising brow):
“Think Trojan Femme. You ride the system until you’re the one driving it.”
[Closing Remarks]
Nico (smiling, eyes fierce):
“Don’t panic. Read. Rethink. Respond.
We’re not endorsing 6C. But we refuse to be the only ones not invited to the new legal order.”
Lita:
“Femme Groups are already legal in twenty states. The question isn’t if you join. It’s whether you understand what’s being built.”
Nico:
“She/Her/Us.
Still lesbian.
Still watching.
Still refusing the script.”
[OUTRO MUSIC: Slow drum loop, overid by distorted femme voices reciting “Commandment Three… Commandment Three…”]
***
“She/Her/Us” — Radical Dialogues in Queer Womanhood
Episode #209: “Femme Power, Legal Custody & the Vote: Inside 6C’s New Gender Engine”
Host: Nico Vega
Guest: Dr. Lita Moon
Live Viewers: 157,000 | Views in 48 Hours: 980,000+
Trigger Warning (in intro): Mentions of gender disenfranchisement, legal hierarchy, and contested custody.
[INTRO MUSIC: Heavy Femme Beat + Echoing Drum Loops]
Nico Vega (opening line, razor-sharp):
“Okay. Let’s not waste time. This week, we are going full blueprint on how the most controversial religious-political movement in the country just quietly proposed giving lesbians the vote—and stripping it from men.”
Segment 1: How Femme Groups Actually Work
Lita Moon:
“Right. First off, the basics. Under 6C w, a Femme Group is a recognized household unit made up of co-wives, concubines, and in many cases, legally bonded non-sexual female partners who share domestic, reproductive, or caregiving rhythms.”
Nico (half-smirking):
“They’ve got charts. Like… literal cohabitation maps.”
Lita (reading from a leaked training manual):
“Femme Group = A legally codified female trust cluster formed through shared contractual registration with one Anchor (male partner) and sustained via cooperative ritual.”
“So it’s not just domestic. It’s political. It’s financial. It’s spiritual.”
Segment 2: What’s in the Concubines Cuse
Nico (flipping notes):
“This cuse is insane. Let me read you the direct excerpt from Polygamy Law v1.1—yes, that’s a thing:
‘Each registered husband may wfully sustain up to two concubines under structured consent, provisioned welfare, and sexual exclusivity. Concubines may not reside apart from the Femme Group.’”
Lita (adds):
“And unlike wives, concubines don’t require male guardian approval to enter these contracts. But they must be approved by the Femme Group they’re joining. It’s less a marriage than an absorption.”
Nico (deadpan):
“Transtion: Your poly household is now a recognized voting unit. Which brings us to…”
Segment 3: Custody Battles in Femme Trusts
Lita:
“The big thing we’re seeing is shared custody cims—not just over children, but over ex-wives, emotional caregivers, and even old concubines. And yes, the courts are ruling on this. There are tiered tribunals, and guess who presides? Muslim-trained marital judges—both male and female.”
Nico:
“There’s even a thing called Custody Echo Points. It’s like, who touched the rhythm first? Who sustained it longest? Who kept the emotional tempo of the house?”
Lita:
“It’s insane. It’s poetic. It’s—functioning.”
Segment 4: The Leaked Voting Bill
Nico (leans forward):
“Okay. Here’s the real nuke. According to a leaked 6C bill draft being circuted by municipal insiders in Iowa and Missouri—voting rights are about to be rewritten.”
Lita:
“The draft w restructures state governance. Currently, every 6C state has just one upper house member and one lower house member. Symbolic democracy.”
Nico:
“But the new bill proposes expanding lower houses to 10–20 seats—but only allowing registered Femme Groups to vote.”
Lita (reading):
“Section 6: Only registered Femme Groups shall constitute voting blocs for State Representation. Individuals outside a registered group—including single women, unregistered concubines, and all males—shall not possess voting rights.”
Nico (repeating slowly):
“Men. Can’t. Vote.”
“Single women. Can’t. Vote.”
Lita:
“The vote becomes a collective trust function. Every concubine and wife channels her political will through her registered Femme Group. It’s like... legistive polyamory.”
Nico (half-ughing, half-terrified):
“I need everyone listening to understand this:
The only group in the United States being handed direct political representation in 6C states is Femme Groups.
Not political parties. Not activist coalitions.
Legalized female collectives anchored by one man.”
Lita:
“And while the rest of the country screams about voter suppression, 6C is quietly repcing the electorate—with rhythm-bound, trust-indexed poly units. And they’re doing it with ritual, not riot.”
Closing Segment: Feminist Dystopia or Queer Utopia?
Nico:
“This is the most confusing timeline I’ve ever lived through.
Because somehow… we’re closer to power in this theocracy than we’ve ever been under rainbow capitalism.”
Lita:
“Power is being redefined. Not as freedom from men—but as control over female structure with one man at the periphery. And that’s... deeply seductive. And deeply dangerous.”
Nico (final line):
“You may not believe in 6C.
But make no mistake—they believe in you.”
[OUTRO MUSIC: Dissonant orchestral build under whispers of “Only the group votes… Only the rhythm counts… Only the trust survives…”]
***
Podcast: “She/Her/Us” – Live Comments Response Segment
Episode #209: “Femme Power, Legal Custody & the Vote: Inside 6C’s New Gender Engine”
Hosts: Nico Vega & Dr. Lita Moon
Live Viewers: 163,000
Overy Title: “REAL QUESTIONS. RHYTHMIC ANSWERS.”
[Synth outro fades to ambient hum as Nico and Lita lean toward their monitors.]
Nico:
“All right, the chat is an inferno. You queers never disappoint. Let’s pull some of these up. I’m sweating, Lita’s glowing—let’s get into it.”
Comment 1 – @IndyPrideLawyer:
“This is disenfranchisement, full stop. You’re romanticizing it. What happens to women who don’t want to be in a Femme Group?”
Lita (nods, calmly):
“You’re absolutely right—it is disenfranchisement. And it’s strategic. 6C doesn’t hide it.
They say: Only the organized shall govern. Only the rhythm-bound shall vote.”
Nico:
“And the subtext is brutal: If you’re not in sync with a group, you don’t matter. Which is anti-liberal, anti-pluralist—and somehow... deeply attractive to women who’ve been politically ignored.*”
Comment 2 – @WifeThreeOhio:
“As a registered co-wife, I vote with my group. And it feels safer than the broken chaos of solo ballots. Sorry not sorry.”
Nico (reading, eyebrows raised):
“There it is. Lived experience as defense. This isn’t ideology anymore. These women are living the alternative.”
Lita:
“And that’s why it’s spreading. It’s not being forced. It’s being chosen. Not by everyone. But enough to tip systems.”
Comment 3 – @ButchTheoryDropout:
“So we’re really just handing patriarchal religion a functioning matriarchy with one dude in the corner?”
Lita (ughing softly):
“Yes. Exactly.
It’s theocratic polystructure, where male presence is mandatory but peripheral. They anchor the contract. We run the rhythm.”
Nico:
“Patriarchy outsourced its sovereignty—and women are building empires in the space it left open.”
Comment 4 – @ExFeministNowFemme:
“Liberal feminism taught me to scream for autonomy. 6C taught me to use it to build power. That’s the difference.”
Nico (softly):
“Chills. Literal chills.”
Lita:
“I want that on a t-shirt and a legal textbook.”
Comment 5 – @LesbianHistorian84:
“So wait. Is 6C actually handing lesbians structural power inside a hetero-faith framework?”
Nico:
“Yes. And it’s not theoretical. Femme Groups of all-lesbian co-wives are registering, voting, and controlling child custody decisions inside 6C w.”
Lita:
“Every time we say, ‘No system works for us’—6C is whispering: We built one.”
Comment 6 – @SecurChaosAgent:
“This feels like Handmaid’s Tale written by Audre Lorde. Am I hallucinating?”
Nico (ughs, dead serious):
“No. You’re just te to the post-liberal, matriarchal theocracy timeline. Welcome.”
Closing Reflection:
Lita (seriously):
“If the price of power is structure—some women are willing to pay it. Even if that structure was built by someone else.”
Nico:
“And if the only door open is 6C’s? You’d be surprised who walks through it.”
[OUTRO MUSIC: A blend of rising choral hums with a heartbeat pulse beneath.]
Nico:
“She/Her/Us.
Still watching. Still questioning. Still inside the rhythm.”
